News features and technical articles about the evolution of aquaculture, one of the world’s fastest growing industries.

Feeding strategies vary for shrimp producers

Albert G.J. Tacon, Ph.D. Sergio F. Nates, Ph.D. Roderick J. McNeil, Ph.D.

Production costs depend on farming systems

Feeding strategies
No precise statistical information is available regarding the percentage of farmers who use fertilizers, supplementary feeds, or complete compounded diets.

In common with poultry and salmon, shrimp have a dietary requirement for 40 or so essential nutrients. However, in marked contrast to commercial poultry and salmon-farming operations, where animals are raised almost exclusively within intensive farming systems and fed nutritionally complete, artificially compounded diets for their entire life cycle, shrimp are currently farmed in a wide range of production systems and fed under an equally diverse array of feeding strategies throughout their life cycle.

Varied systems, varied feeding

The farming systems and feeding strategies currently employed for marine shrimp vary relative to the shrimp stage of development, culture species, country, and financial resources of the farmers. Some of the varied strategies used to grow out shrimp are shown in Table 1.

At present, no precise statistical information exists on the proportion of current global shrimp production obtained from these different farming systems, either by species or country. Total global production for 2002 was reported simply by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 2004 as 1.29 million metric tons (MT).

As with farming systems, no precise statistical information is available regarding the percentage of farmers who use fertilizers, supplementary feeds, or complete compounded diets. Despite this, it has been estimated that the total aquafeed production in 2002 was about 2.1 million MT. The bulk of shrimp culture and aquafeed production are located within Asia and Latin America.

Feed composition varies widely within and between countries, reflecting species and farming system differences, and the increasing demand by farmers for cheaper feeds rather than possibly more expensive but cost-effective feeds. Limited practical information concerning the dietary requirements of shrimp under practical culture conditions is available.

Feeding strategies
Aquafeed production costs range from as low as $1 to $2 per kilogram of live shrimp for conventional extensive outdoor farming with no external nutrient input to $4 to $7.50 for intensive indoor farming systems with fertilization. 

Costs direct production, feeding

feeding treatments
Fig. 1: Mean weekly shrimp growth of different feeding treatments, from Tacon et al 2002.

Coupled with often marked differences – even within countries – in farmers’ feeding methods and culture systems, the shrimp industry is currently in a quandary How can it best remain profitable in view of increasing global shrimp production, increasing global concern for the environment, increasing feed ingredient prices, decreasing shrimp prices, and increasing import restrictions due to concerns over perceived food safety risks and/or farming/marketing practices?

The bottom line in any commercial farming operation addresses costs, profitability, and the consequent need to tailor production systems – and feeding costs – to what the market is willing to pay for the final product. 

Production costs vary widely depending upon the farming system employed. They can range from as low as $1.00 to 2.00 per kilograms live shrimp for conventional extensive outdoor farming with no external nutrient input to $4.00 to 7.50 per kilograms live shrimp for intensive indoor farming systems with fertilization and/or supplementary or complete diet feeding. 

The problem is further compounded by the fact that in some countries, the development of the sector can be constrained by other factors. These factors can include the cost and availability of land, water, power, labor, and feed. National farm-planning regulations and environmental controls, import/export costs and incentives, and proximity to existing markets also play a role.

Practical feed

weight of shrimp
Fig. 2: Final body weight of shrimp reared in clean flowing water or pond water and fed a 35%-protein complete diet, the same diet without trace minerals or vitamin premixes, or a 25%-protein complete diet. Values reflect the means of three observations. Error bars represent ± 1 standard deviation. From Decamp et al., 2002.

The consideration of a few basic points can help direct the development of practical shrimp feeds.

Tailor feed formulations. Always tailor feed to the intended shrimp species and farming system, with consideration of shrimp stocking density, water management, and natural food availability.

Recognize natural feeding behaviors. Shrimp do not naturally eat “once or twice during an eight-hour workday,” and will eat continuously if offered food on a little and often basis, as they do in the wild in the absence of predators. 

With unrestricted feed access, shrimp have the capacity to grow very fast under both clear water and pond water culture conditions. 

For example, growth rates achieved by the first author with Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) grown at moderate and high densities of 55 and 71 animals per cubic meter on a high-quality, 35 percent-crude protein, fishmeal-based diet averaged 1.44 grams per week in outdoor clear-running water tanks. The animals grew 1.98-13.48 grams over an eight-week period at 26.4 to 29.1 degrees-C.

In outdoor zero-water-exchange tanks, animals grew from 1.58 to 18.89 g at 2.1 grams per week over eight weeks at 28.2 to 31.3 degrees-C. When fed all day, shrimp grew over 3 grams per week from weeks 4 to 6 (Fig. 1).

Consider benthic foods. Shrimp have the unique ability to harness food and nutrient particles suspended in the water column and through benthic foraging, in addition to the food provided through compound aquafeeds. In this respect, it is essential to recognize the key nutritional role played by microorganisms in the nutrition and health of shrimp reared under green water or zero-water-exchange culture conditions. Results of a related study are shown in Fig. 2.

(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the April 2005 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)


Now that you've finished reading the article...

… we hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.

By becoming a Global Aquaculture Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the 
pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events
 (The Academy, The Advocate, GAA Films, GOAL, MyGAA) can continue. An individual membership costs just $50 a year.

Support GAA and Become a Member