Study evaluates effects of various stocking densities
Brazil has 12 percent of the world’s freshwater resources, with an estimated 6 million ha of man-made reservoirs, most of which are associated with hydropower plants. The southeastern part of the country has 2.35 million ha of these large reservoirs that, if managed as proposed by Beveridge (1984) and Schmittou (1993), could yield an estimated 4.9 to 14.1 million metric tons of farmed fish and fisheries products.
Cage fish farming is an excellent way to utilize lakes and reservoirs otherwise unsuitable for conventional aquaculture. With adequate management of carrying capacity, cage fish farming can be carried out with minimal harm to the environment.
The authors recently carried out a study on the performance and economics of cage farming Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in southeast Brazil. This research evaluated the influence of different stocking densities – 300-400 and 500 to 600 fish per cubic meter – under commercial production conditions. The study was carried out in the 3.3-ha, 4.0-meter-deep reservoir of Chapadao and that of Colonia Nova, an 8.8-ha, 2.6-meter-deep reservoir.
The Chapadao reservoir had nine cages with a total volume of 94.5 cubic meters, and Colonia Nova had 27 cages with a volume of 235.7 cubic meters. Feed consumption, fish survival rate, and water temperature were recorded daily during scheduled feeding from September 2001 to April 2002. Dissolved oxygen, pH, and water transparency were re-corded every 15 days.
Fish growth was evaluated monthly by weighting a 3 percent sample of the population. The caged tilapia were fed commercial floating pellets with 32 percent crude protein two times every day. Feeding rate was adjusted based on sample weight and survival rate.
The carrying capacity of both stocking densities was set to 200 kilograms per cubic meter. The 500-600 fish per cubic meter density resulted in larger accumulated biomass (Fig. 1) and better feeding efficiency than the lower density. No significant (P > 0.05) differences between the individual, average weight of fish of both densities (Fig. 2) were observed, suggesting the increased stocking density did not influence individual fish growth.
The Logistic and Mitscherlich functions were used to estimate production functions. The estimated curves can be represented by the following equations:
AB300a400 = f(AR) = 200 •
(1 – 10(–0.001884•RA–0,066106))
AB500a600 = f(AR) = 200 •
(1 – 10(–0.002680•RA–0,061152))
f(AR) = (AB) accumulated biomass (kg m-3)
AR = accumulated consumed ration (kg m-3).
The economic biomass, the value of accumulated fish biomass that maximizes the economic return of the production system, is reached when the harvest point maximizes profit. The profit represents the difference between the total revenues from fish sales and their production costs.
In this study, the biomass that maximized profit at a density of 500 to 600 fish per cubic meter was 145 kilograms per cubic meter (fish weight gain was 2.45 grams per day) and had the best feed conversion. The economic biomass for the 300 to 400 fish per cubic meter stocking density was 121 kilograms per cubic meter (fish weight gain was 2.35 grams per day).
A stocking density of 500 to 600 fish per cubic meter and average fish weight of 283 grams have many advantages, including the optimization of space and production time, better feed conversion, and higher fish production per cage volume. Such conditions were more profitable than the lower stocking density (Table 1).
Conte, Economic analysis of study results, Table 1
|Total Costs (U.S. $/m3)||19.07||21.19|
|Economic biomass (kg/m3)||121||145|
|Total Receive (U.S. $/m3)||82.37||98.70|
|Profit (U.S. $/msup>3)||22.06||33.37|
Note: Cited references are available from the authors.
(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the December 2003 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)
Now that you've finished reading the article...
… we hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.
By becoming a Global Aquaculture Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events can continue. Individual membership costs just $50 a year. This year, GAA individual and corporate members receive complimentary access to the virtual GOAL conference in October. Join now.