News features and technical articles about the evolution of aquaculture, one of the world’s fastest growing industries.

The microsporidium Perezia sp. and cotton shrimp disease

Jee Eun Han, DVM, Ph.D. Seung Chan Lee Seul Chan Park Marc Le Groumellec, DVM, Ph.D.

Detection by histopathology, and new in situ hybridization and PCR methods

cotton shrimp disease
In this study, samples of microsporidia-infected shrimp – including black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) – collected in Madagascar, Mozambique and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and with clinical signs of cotton shrimp disease. Photo by Darryl Jory.

Microsporidia are obligate intracellular parasites in a variety of hosts, from invertebrates to humans. Research for microsporidia has been more focused on terrestrial hosts, but approximately 50 percent of the known microsporidia genera infect aquatic hosts like crustaceans and fish. These microsporidian infections of aquatic hosts are considered a potential health hazard as well as a financial risk in aquaculture.

One of the critical diseases that impact shrimp aquaculture is “cotton shrimp disease” (CSD), and causative agents associated with this disease are microsporidia found in at least five genera including PleistophoraThelohania, Perezia, Agmasoma and Ameson. These microsporidian parasites mainly infect skeletal muscle, rendering the affected body regions white or opaque, which gives the common name to this disease. Lightly infected shrimp may look and behave normally, but heavy infections render the shrimp unmarketable or inedible. In shrimp, the white-opaque appearance of muscle is primarily linked to microsporidian infections. However, other causative agents such as dinoflagellates, bacteria, or viruses, may also be related to this disease.

This study focused on the microsporidium associated with CSD in shrimp collected from Madagascar, Mozambique and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We investigated its histopathological characteristics and determined its taxonomical classification by small subunit rDNA (SSU rDNA) sequencing. These sequences are widely used for elucidating evolutionary relationships among organisms, since they are of ancient origin and are found in all known forms of life.

Also, specific diagnostic methods were developed for this disease based on: 1. in situ hybridization [ISH; a type of hybridization using a labeled complementary DNA, RNA or modified nucleic acids strand (i.e., probe) to localize a specific DNA or RNA sequence in a portion or section of tissue]; and 2. polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a method widely employed in molecular biology to make numerous copies of a specific DNA segment) targeting the SSU rDNA sequence.

Study setup

A total of 298 shrimp samples exhibiting clinical signs of CSD were submitted from Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia to the Aquaculture Pathology Laboratory at the University of Arizona over a period of several years. Table 1 summarizes relevant information.

Han, CSD, Table 1

Country and speciesLife stageGradeTarget organNo. pos/total samplesPCR
Madagascar (P. monodon)AdultG3-G4Muscle3/3NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)JuvenileG3-G4Muscle/HP6/30NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)Sub-adultNAMuscle/HPNApos.
Madagascar (P. monodon)Sub-adultG3-G4Muscle/HP4/19NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)AdultG2-G3Muscle/HP/heart3/5NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)Sub-adultG1-G3Muscle/HP6/28NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)JuvenileNAMuscleNApos.
Madagascar (P. monodon)JuvenileG3-G4Muscle/HP35/35NA
Madagascar (P. monodon)JuvenileNAMuscle/HPNApos.
Mozambique (P. monodon)JuvenileG3-G4Muscle/HP/gill/heart/LO4/23NA
Mozambique (P. monodon)PLG3-G4Muscle/HP/gill/heart/LO2/50NA
Mozambique (P. monodon)AdultG3-G4Muscle/HP/gill/heart/LO4/4NA
Saudi Arabia (P. indicus)AdultG4Muscle/HP/gill/heart/LO3/3NA
Saudi Arabia (P. indicus)AdultG2-G4Muscle/HP30/93NA
Saudi Arabia (P. indicus)AdultNAMuscleNApos.
Saudi Arabia (P. indicus)JuvenileG2-G4Muscle/HP5/5NA
Table 1. Samples of cotton shrimp disease used in this study (modified from original table). Samples were analyzed by histopathological examination (for microsporidian presence) and PCR assays. G-grade system ranges from G0 (negative) to G4 (highest severity). PCR column indicates Perezia sp.-positive target organ (HP: hepatopancreas; LO: lymphoid organ). PL: postlarvae; pos.: positive; na: not available.

The Davidson’s alcohol-formalin-acetic acid (AFA) fixed samples were processed, embedded in paraffin and sectioned (4 µm thick) in accordance with standard methods (Lightner, 1996). After staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Giemsa, the sections were analyzed by light microscopy and the severity of the infection was graded according to a pre-established G-grading system (from Lightner, 1996). Grading includes (G0) with no signs of infection/infestation by pathogen; (G1) signs of infection/infestation by pathogen are present, but at levels below those needed for clinical disease; (G2−G3) moderate to high signs of infection and/or infestation by number and severity of pathogen-caused lesions; and (G4) severe lesions and advanced tissue destruction with high pathogen numbers.

Results and discussion

Histopathology examination

In shrimp and other crustaceans, Perezia spp. destroy the muscles and gradually replaces the musculature by masses of parasite developmental stages and spores. At the late stages of infection, parasites may invade other tissues and organs – such as cardiomyocytes, epithelial and connective tissue cells of the antennal glands – in the same shrimp. In this study, several tissues of the same shrimp were affected by this microsporidium. Histopathology examination revealed numerous microsporidian spores in samples collected from Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia. The infection affected primarily hepatopancreas and muscle, at the severity level corresponding to grades ranging from G1 to G4.

Mature spores were seen among skeletal muscle fibers (Fig. 1A, B), and pre-spore stages and spores infected epithelium of hepatopancreas tubules (Fig. 1C, D). In severe infections, spores were also observed within epithelial cells of gill filament (Fig.1E, F), heart muscle fibers (Fig. 1G), and parenchymal cells of the lymphoid organ (Fig. 1H). Spores spreading all over the organism at the advanced stages of infection might have derived from muscle infection: muscles gradually deteriorated and spores contaminated surrounding tissues. In addition, most cases (90 percent) of CSD were accompanied by infections of gill fouling disease caused by Zoothamnium sp. or Epistylis sp., which indicated that animals suffering microsporidiosis were probably weak and susceptible to secondary infections or infestations.

cotton shrimp disease
Fig. 1: Representative lesions characteristic of the disease caused by the microsporidian found in penaeid shrimp from Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia. (A,B) Mature spores accumulated in between skeletal muscle fibers; (C,D) pre-spores (arrows) and spore stages (arrowheads) within hepatopancreas tubule epithelial cells (inset shows sloughing cells); (E,F) intracytoplasmic accumulations of mature spores within gill filament epithelial cells; (G) mature spores within heart muscle fibers; (H) parenchymal cells of lymphoid organ tubules. Stain: (A,C,E,G,H) Mayer-Bennett hematoxylin/ eosin-phloxine; (B,D,F) Giemsa. Scale bars = 30 µm.

SSU rDNA sequence of the new microsporidium causing CSD

We performed PCR targeting SSU rDNA sequences from the shrimp exhibiting CSD, collected in Madagascar, and a 1.2 kbp fragment was obtained and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence of SSU rDNA was deposited in Genbank. According to test results, the nucleotide sequence had a 94 percent identity to the SSU rDNA sequence of Pleistophora sp. infecting Penaeus setiferus, and 93 percent identity to that of an unidentified micro sporidium from Metapenaeus joineri. In 2002, Pleistophora sp. from P. setiferus was re-identified as Perezia nelsoni by morphological examinations. Based on sequence information, we therefore now consider the newly identified microsporidium to belong to the genus Perezia, and will refer to it as Perezia sp. hereafter. The CSD caused by Perezia sp. seems to be spread over several shrimp farming countries, including Madagascar, Mozambique, Saudi Arabia (the present study), the United States and Japan, but it has not been sufficiently studied.

In this study, extracted genomic DNAs from the Madagascar and Saudi Arabia samples were subjected to PCR with specific primers targeting SSU rDNA. The sequences obtained were 100 percent identical for both samples. Coincidentally, white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) detected in these same 3 countries (Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia) also showed identical genomic patterns.

Perezia sp. – specific ISH

The probe strongly reacted to both skeletal muscle and hepatopancreas (Fig. 2A-C), and also other organs such as gill, heart, and lymphoid organ (data not shown), corresponding to the histopathology results. The probe designed from the SSU rDNA sequence of Perezia sp. appeared to be specific to shrimp with symptoms of CSD from Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia.

At the beginning, we misidentified Perezia sp. infection as EHP infection by normal histopathology examination. However, this ISH probe did not react toP. stylirostris infected with E. hepatopenaei (Fig. 2D). No reaction was seen in any of the tissues prepared from pathogen-free P. vannamei. Also P. vannamei and P. monodon – as well as polychaetes infected with an unidentified Agmasoma-like microsporidium – did not react to ISH probes (data not included here).

cotton shrimp disease
Fig. 2: In situ hybridization assay (ISH) with a digoxigen-labeled gene probe specific for detection of the microsporidian causing cotton shrimp disease. Dark blue precipitate indicates the presence of the parasite (A) within hepatopancreas tubule epithelial cells of Penaeus indicus from Saudi Arabia, (B) among skeletal muscle fibers of P. monodon from Mozambique and (C)

within hepatopancreas tubule epithelial cells of P. monodon from Madagascar. (D) Portion of the hepatopancreas from P. stylirostris from Brunei infected by Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei showing representative results, emphasizing the specificity of the probe as demonstrated by the absence of dark blue precipitate. Stain: Bismark-Brown counterstain. Scale bars = 30 μm

Perezia sp. – specific PCR

For diagnostic purposes, we designed a pair of PCR primers targeting Perezia sp. DNA and generated a 443 bp amplicon (molecular biology term to designate a piece of DNA or RNA that is the source and/or product of amplification or replication events), shown in Fig. 3. This PCR reaction is specific to the microsporidium Perezia sp. that causes CSD, and thus may be useful for monitoring this parasite. These primers did not react to the microsporidian DNA from E. hepatopenaei-infected shrimps (data not shown). Also, there was no cross-reaction to genomic DNA from shrimp (P. vannamei, P. monodon, P. indicus, P. stylirostris and Macrobrachium rosenbergii), polychaetes, squid and Artemia spp. (data not shown).

We did not analyze Mozambique samples by PCR, but the probe reacted intensely to ISH by depositing the reaction products in the target cells in Mozambique samples. In this study, we describe muscle and hepatopancreas-infecting microsporidia causing CSD in shrimps from Madagascar, Mozambique and Saudi Arabia in the Red Sea-Indian Ocean region.

Fig. 3: Perezia sp.-specific PCR results. Lanes 1-2: Penaeus monodon hepatopancreas from Madagascar; Lanes 3-6: P. monodon muscle from Madagascar; Lanes 7-8: P. indicus muscle from Saudi Arabia; Lane 9: Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP); Lane 10: specific pathogen free (SPF) control; Lane 11: negative control (NC).


Microsporidian infections were confirmed by histopathological analysis and the parasites were identified as Perezia sp. Also, we developed ISH and PCR assays capable of detecting this parasite. These methods can help shrimp producers in the diagnostic and management of CSD caused by the microsporidium Perezia sp.

References available from first author.

Now that you've finished reading the article...

… we  hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.

By becoming a Global Aquaculture Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events can continue. Individual membership costs just $50 a year. This year, GAA individual and corporate members receive complimentary access to the virtual GOAL conference in October. Join now.

Support GAA and Become a Member