Fish on a diet containing 45 percent crude protein at 4,000 kcal/kg utilized feed most efficiently
The olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) is a popular food fish and one of the most important aquaculture species in Korea. Culture operations have expanded extensively since 1990, and production reached 39,628 metric tons (MT) in 2001.
Moist pellet diets based on raw fish are still used in the most intensive inland tank culture systems in Korea. These diets can cause many problems in flounder culture, including disease outbreaks, water pollution, and high production cost. Future development of flounder aquaculture in Korea will require the development of formulated commercial diets.
Feeding trials conducted by the authors to determine the dietary protein level and protein-to-energy (P/E) ratio for optimum growth of juvenile olive flounder provided basic information that could lead to the formulation of extruded pellet diets for this species.
P/E ratios in fish feeds
Protein and energy in fish diets should be kept in balance. Theoretically, a dietary deficiency or excess of digestible energy can reduce growth rates in fish. Energy intake is a basic nutritional requirement, because maintenance of life processes takes priority over growth and other functions. Thus, energy concentration should be one of the most important considerations in diet formulation for fish.
Sixteen experimental diets were formulated with four protein levels for each of four energy levels:
- 25, 30, 35 and 45 percent crude protein with 3,000 kcal/kg
- 30, 35, 40 and 50 percent crude protein with 3,500 kcal/kg
- 35, 45, 50 and 60 percent crude protein with 4,000 kcal/kg
- 35, 40, 45 and 55 percent crude protein with 4500 kcal/kg.
After a one-week conditioning period, fish averaging about 8.1 g for the diets containing 3,000 or 4,000 kcal/kg and 7.2 grams for the diets containing 3,500 and 4,500 kcal/kg were randomly distributed at 15 fish per tank. Each diet was fed on a dry-matter basis to fish in three randomly selected tanks at 3 to 5 percent of total wet body weight per day for eight weeks.
The weight gains of olive flounder fed the experimental diets are shown in Fig. 1. Weight gains from fish fed the diets containing different protein-to-energy (P/E) ratios are shown in Fig. 2.
For the 3,000-kcal diets, weight gain and feed efficiency of fish fed the 35 percent and 45v-protein diets were significantly higher than those for fish fed 25 percent and 30 percent diets. However, there were no significant differences in weight gain and feed efficiency between fish fed 35 percent and 45 percent protein diets.
Weight gain and feed efficiency for fish in the 3,500-kcal regime fed diets with 40 percent and 50 percent crude protein were significantly higher than those of fish fed 30 percent and 35 percent protein diets. No significant performance differences between fish fed diets of 40 percent and 50 percent protein were found.
For fish that received 4,000-kcal diets, those fed the 45 percent-protein diet had significantly higher weight gain and feed efficiency than those fed 35 percent, 50 percent and 60 percent crude protein.
In the group that received 4,500-kcal diets, weight gain and feed efficiency for the fish fed 45 percent and 55 percent crude protein were significantly higher than those of fish fed 35 percent and 40 percent-protein diets. There were no significant differences in weight gain and feed efficiency between the fish fed 35 percent and 45 percent crude protein.
Fish fed the diet containing 45 percent crude protein at 4,000 kcal/kg appeared to utilize feed more efficiently than fish fed the other diets. For maximum weight gain, the optimum dietary protein levels of fish fed 3,000-; 3,500-; 4,000-; and 4,500-kcal/kg diets could be 35 percent, 40 percent, 45 percent and 45 percent, respectively. The optimum protein-to-energy ratios could be 117, 114, 113 and 100 mg protein/kcal, respectively. Therefore, the optimum P/E ratio in diets for olive flounder appear to be 100 to 117 mg protein/kcal.
(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the April 2002 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)
Now that you've finished reading the article...
… we hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.
By becoming a Global Aquaculture Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events can continue. Individual membership costs just $50 a year. This year, GAA individual and corporate members receive complimentary access to the virtual GOAL conference in October. Join now.